I belong to a very dynamic homeschool group with over 200 families on the mailing list. We have monthly or bimonthly events such as board game day, gym day, and craft day in the fall and winter, park and beach days in the spring and summer, and parent support meetings. There are also annual events such as the science fair, International Day, National Day, Prom, etc. And then there are all kinds of short term classes, one time only activities, field trips, speakers, To say we are an active bunch is an understatement.

So, where does the crazy part come in? Well, my dear friend S, who founded the group about ten years ago, is ready to retire. Her only remaining homeschooler is a teen, and she is ready for a less demanding role. Guess who she has asked to replace her? I feel very honored to have her trust and good faith, and I would like to step up and take the position. BUT... I am horribly disorganized, great at short term projects but not long term, I am not half as diplomatic as S, and I worry that I might damage the group. On top of this, DH is worried about legal ramifications of I am the leader and anything bad happens (a bad fall, allergic reaction, etc.) and the amount of time running the group will take when I am already a busy person.

I have considered asking a friend to share the job, and I am aware of the benefits of delegation, but having this handed to me makes ME feels like the ultimately responsible one. I do have a call in to a homeschool lawyer, so I will find out if there is some easy way to CMA. I think about how quiet and peaceful my life might be if I didn't have to jump in and get involved in so many things, but I must enjoy it, or I wouldn't keep doing it, right?

So what do you think?

I think you should have a partner for the job. Having a particular individual, or a few people, you can split the work with and who you don't want to let down might help you keep going. At least, that's what I've found. I wouldn't pick only on the basis of friendship - find someone you like but who has skills which complement yours.

How does S handle the legal/insurance issues?

I vote for crazy!

Just kidding of course. To me it sounds absolutely horrible but then I'm not as much of a people person as you must be, nor am I apparently as active. I retired last year and had all these plans about things I was going to do and I have to admit I've spent a fair amount of time sitting on the front porch watching the hummingbirds (when there's no snow). After 20 years of a full-time career, I didn't realize how much I would enjoy doing nothing.

I think if you are actually considering this then you must be up for the challenge. Anyway to try a trial run before your friend calls it quits?

I agree with kcab. It sounds like a partner you like and trust would be the best way to go. I think you can find a boilerplate waiver somewhere that releases you from any liability.

Neato

I vote for! The fact that you are bringing it up means something...

Our HS group leader is probably going to be stepping out of the leader shoes in a year or three, and a couple of parents in the group have already started talking about a replacement (a good sign of a healthy group, I think!). One person asked if I would consider taking up the reins and I responded with a resounding NO! But I'm with CFK: I'm not extroverted nor diplomatic enough to think that I could lead such a group without killing it. Besides, I'm INTJ, so I don't want to take the lead unless no one else appears to be capable.

However, I think YOU would make an excellent choice! You seem much more politic and personable than I am!

As for your lawsuit potential...I used to work in risk management, so I know a little bit about how to protect yourself. (Though I'm not an expert and you should remember that my advice is worth exactly what you paid me for it...)

If your position is a voluntary one and everyone signs a standard *hold-harmless agreement* that says they won't hold you or the group responsible for injuries occuring during group functions--and that's standard practice--you'll be pretty safe.

A hold-harmless agreement offers reasonably broad protection from lawsuits, especially for someone who is unpaid, uses common sense, and is just trying to give kids more opportunities for learning. Just remember that there's no risky activities like mountain climbing or skydiving allowed (or perhaps even horseback riding), you must ensure that kids have suitable adult guidance, and if sued you'd still have all the hassle and cost of defending yourself. There's no way to protect yourself from nuisance suits, I'm afraid.

Here's what a hold-harmless looks like--some are more filled with legalese than others. They don't have to be so foreign sounding! I think the first one is probably the most like what you'd want...

http://groups.northwestern.edu/outing/documents/trip_waiver.doc

https://esign.wwu.edu/admcs/process/forms/Campus%20Rec/risk_waiv.aspx?valid=true

https://www.legaldocs.com/htsgif.d/xholdhar.htm

Let us know if we ought to start calling you Madam President!

Is there a way to divide the work/events even more?

You are definitely a good choice for the lead position, but may want to consider a committee with specific areas of responsibility.

Thanks all, for the great feedback. I am still waiting to talk to the lawyer about the legal ramifications. The current leader has not done anything to cover herself. We don't have membership dues or paperwork or anything, so maybe she figures it isn't a "real" group and she cannot be held liable. I think that's a mistake.

Kriston, I appreciate the legal info you provided. I'm not sure if that's enough to please DH, but i will run it by him.

Spent four hours working a Boy Scout flower sale for Mother's day today, and the leaders are trying to talk me into volunteering there. Argh... why is it so hard for me to say no? I did, but I felt extremely guilty about it!

thank you-

Happy to share one of the few truly useful things I know.

It might also help to remind your DH that there are people volunteering to fill such positions all over the country every day, and 99.99% of them do not EVER get sued. A hold harmless agreement, good adult supervision of kids, and a little common sense protects you from darn near all exposure.

Think about if you were on a jury. What would it take for you to find against someone in those particular group-leading shoes? Pretty obviously heinous and irresponsible behavior, right? So just don't do that and you'll be fine.

(Plus have everybody sign the hold harmless! I think the current leader's laissez faire attitude is a mistake, too, FWIW.)

Let us know what you decide. I'm watching with interest!

Hi Lorel,
Happy Mother's Day!
This is a tricky one. I don't encourage you to take it on.
Partially due to the 'wanna-be but never-was' LLL leader inside of me. You have a lot of little people depending on you.
Partially because of the statement above.

Here's what I think!
1) Is there anyone else who could do this work? For a mom of a singleton, having an engaging hobby besides the only child might be a real blessing.
2) Is there a way you could break up the work into significant, independently working parts, that you could take on one of? Since the group has always been casuall, perhaps it doesn't need one overall leader, rather someone willing to organize a 'Yahoo Group' way to share the information, and a lot of someones willing to organise the various events?
3) Is the current leader willing to stay and do it one more year, allowing you and a few others to be trained throughout a whole cycle? It's hard to imagine something that 'single-person-developed' surviving without a long, long, transition period. You know how long it takes you to teach one of your kids to take on a new level of responsibility? It's no different for grown-ups. Would you bring one of your kids into the kitchen and say, "I thought you should cook dinner tonight. I'll be availible for any advice you need." I doubt it.



Love and More Love,
Grinity