|
|
#17803 - 06/13/08 05:09 AM
Re: One step forward, one step ...
[Re: gratified3]
|
Member
Registered: 04/15/08
Posts: 368
Loc: philadelphia suburbs
|
The school hasn't had a chance to meet your kid and figure this out for themselves and you've had no testing. Totally agree. We want them to meet DS and we do want to get him tested. We haven't done it up to this point because it is part of the process of identification. However since this is a long process, we've decided to get him tested this summer on our own. I strongly recommend avoiding the WPPSI. It is a test designed for kids up to 7 and GT kids in the upper ages will hit so many ceilings that the test doesn't yield much helpful info. Did the SD request or require that test? If not, the SBV can be used in the K age group, otherwise, the WISCIV can be used only after 6 yo. There are massive ceiling issues on the SBV and WISCIV for the HG crowd that leads to problems anyway, but the WPPSI will magnify that and potentially mess up your results. This was just the testing that I was able find. I've got quotes from $350 up to nearly $2k. If we submit the written request for early admissions, they'd perform their own test. We're trying to find out what they'd test so that we don't overlap. I suspect--but don't know--that he'd run into ceilings on WPPSI. I sometimes think that we are forced to argue so hard for our kids that we end up talking ourselves into things trying to get our point across. Not saying you are heading there, but full grade skip of K isn't the only way to handle an HG kid in schools. Some stay at grade level with good teachers who differentiate, and some have happy times in K and skip later, and some get decent subject acceleration or other methods (ALEKS for math on computer in the classroom) that all works out. Even if the school sees the numbers you expect, meets your kid and still says no, it doesn't mean it will be a disaster. Both DW and I agree completely. What was a little frustration on our end was the pat answer and very hard push back from the principal (who, incidentally had already talked to the assistance superintendent our us by the time I called). Compared with the director we met with who clearly expressed her recommendation and opinion but we still considered that meeting a positive one. So, I understand where they are coming from and until either we provide them with more evidence we'll get standard answers. We'll just need to be persistent. They way that I left it was the principal was that we may request early admissions so that we start the process of testing, but we may still elect not to. JB
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#17804 - 06/13/08 05:12 AM
Re: One step forward, one step ...
[Re: EandCmom]
|
Member
Registered: 04/15/08
Posts: 368
Loc: philadelphia suburbs
|
I just wanted to agree with this. There are several others here with PG kids who have made public schools work great for them. So don't lose hope yet!!! Nope! Not yet! Unfortunately asking about our options has triggered somewhat of a knee-jerk reaction, we're going to try very hard to keep a positive attitude! Thanks JB
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#17805 - 06/13/08 05:19 AM
Re: One step forward, one step ...
[Re: JBDad]
|
Member
Registered: 06/30/06
Posts: 3479
Loc: The Real World
|
Best wishes JB!!! One of the hardest things I've found to pull off is the "poker face". It's normal to have doubts, and realistic to consider alternatives, but most schools will pounce on parental indecision as an opportunity for them to ensure that their relatively "status quo" plan will be fine for your child. In their defense, they get many worried parents, and their seasoned reassurance if typically all that is needed.
However, if you have the child that truly is the "exception", you will most likely need persistance and a lot of confidence (that can be faked if needed).
I started talking with my school district when DS was 3 (thanks to older children), and now that he's 9, I can see the progression in their responses over the years. It took LOTS of time to "prove" that DS was indeed the exception, but it was a steady progression that was not without accommodations along the way. Still, if I was starting over again...I think the one thing I'd do differently is to be more (pleasantly) forceful early on.
Anyway, I wanted to be encouraging...and I hope that does come across as such. In summary I would just remind you to keep up the great work of looking into things for yourselves, and educating the school along with each other as you consider options and outcomes. You are off to a fabulous start!!!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#17807 - 06/13/08 05:22 AM
Re: One step forward, one step ...
[Re: Dottie]
|
Member
Registered: 04/15/08
Posts: 368
Loc: philadelphia suburbs
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#17820 - 06/13/08 08:27 AM
Re: One step forward, one step ...
[Re: acs]
|
Member
Registered: 06/30/06
Posts: 3479
Loc: The Real World
|
Oh ACS, that does sound so perfect! But I can also remember DS's first reading screening....where he was reading MTH books, and earned a "3" on the DRA. The tester started him at level 1, and claimed you could only test 3 levels in what sitting. I certainly can't speak for all schools, but I'm pretty certain that mine would have put (insert smartest kid you can think of) at a level 3 as well. Kriston, you said it quite well too, it just seemed to need repeating,  . I think the best thing a parent can probably do is find out how the school works sort of "undercover" before taking any approach. Ask around, and try to find out where your school falls on the spectrum, and find a way to work with that as best you can.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#17823 - 06/13/08 08:48 AM
Re: One step forward, one step ...
[Re: JBDad]
|
Member
Registered: 09/20/07
Posts: 599
Loc: Summer homeschooling
|
[*] Fall-back plan as proposed by my DW is that the worse case we will home school in the afternoons after K. That would solve next school year, but then we'd have new/different problems the following year. (I'm starting to warm up to this idea but I worry that DW will go insane.) [/list] Brick walls are there for a reason. ( Randy Pausch) JB I think it's good to know and accept that you really need to look at your child's educational life in 6-12 month chunks of time. If that will work for next year - excellent. If you child is happy socially at school and reasonably engaged, all the better. Then decide where you need to go and what you need to do for first grade next winter/spring. It's good to keep it in the back of your mind you'll probably always need to do adjusting unless you full time homeschool. In which case, you're just do it all on your own turf! Good luck!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|