GT-CyberSource Logo

Welcome to the Gifted Issues Discussion Forum.

We invite you to share your experiences and to post information about advocacy, research and other gifted education issues on this free public discussion forum. CLICK HERE to Log In.

Links
DITD Logo

GT-CyberSource

Find a Resource

How gifted-friendly is
your state?

Gifted Exchange Blog

Subscribe to e-Newsletters

Who's Online
5 registered (Cathy A, Nan, playandlearn, StarMan, 1 invisible), 9 Guests and 14 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Jodi Bible, vitzy, OHmom, diana, Joe
1876 Registered Users
Page 3 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >
Topic Options
#22062 - 08/04/08 07:18 AM Re: NCLB and Gifted Students [Re: CFK]
Kriston Offline
Member

Registered: 09/19/07
Posts: 3779
Loc: here! Where else? (Duh!)
Originally Posted By: CFK
I think that IQ test score numbers are too arbitrary, some people only look at VCI, some only at PRI, some only at GAI. I read a description somewhere that I liked that said something like:

(in academic terms)
1-2 years above grade level = MG
3-4 years above grade level = HG
5-6 years above grade level = EG
above that = PG

Again, arbitrary, depending on the level of curricula your area uses but it fits my own personal definition better.



I think DYS looks for kids working at least 3 years above grade level, so this seems a bit high based on their standards. It also is problematic for kids who are 2E. But for my part, I'm all in favor of more tools for IDing LOGs rather than fewer. I think looking at where a child is operating makes great sense!

Top
#22063 - 08/04/08 07:25 AM Re: NCLB and Gifted Students [Re: Kriston]
Dottie Offline
Member

Registered: 06/30/06
Posts: 3280
Loc: The Real World
I agree Kriston, the more tools the better. Too many make the mistake of trying to read a great sweeping conclusion from very limited data.

Top
#22064 - 08/04/08 07:25 AM Re: NCLB and Gifted Students [Re: Dottie]
CFK Offline
Member

Registered: 06/21/07
Posts: 358
Loc: heading in a new direction
True, I was thinking more of youngish elementary age. Once you get to a certain level it's a moot point. I guess you could come up with a scale on the other side like:

college at ? - 10 = PG
11 - 12 = EG
13 -14 = HG
15-16 = MG

Top
#22065 - 08/04/08 07:27 AM Re: NCLB and Gifted Students [Re: Kriston]
CFK Offline
Member

Registered: 06/21/07
Posts: 358
Loc: heading in a new direction
Originally Posted By: Kriston
Originally Posted By: CFK
I think that IQ test score numbers are too arbitrary, some people only look at VCI, some only at PRI, some only at GAI. I read a description somewhere that I liked that said something like:

(in academic terms)
1-2 years above grade level = MG
3-4 years above grade level = HG
5-6 years above grade level = EG
above that = PG



I think DYS looks for kids working at least 3 years above grade level, so this seems a bit high based on their standards.


I'm a hard grader!

Top
#22066 - 08/04/08 07:28 AM Re: NCLB and Gifted Students [Re: CFK]
Kriston Offline
Member

Registered: 09/19/07
Posts: 3779
Loc: here! Where else? (Duh!)
LOL!

Top
#22067 - 08/04/08 07:35 AM Re: NCLB and Gifted Students [Re: Dottie]
Texas Summer Offline
Member

Registered: 05/01/06
Posts: 203
Loc: Texas
I use the terminology the same way. I tend to refer to individuals with scores over 145 as HG or PG depending on the context.

This is Dr. Ruf's revised (for Wisc IV and SB 5) levels of giftedness.

Level One 117-129 MG
Level Two 125-135 HG
Level Three 130-140 EG
Level Four 135-141 EG to PG
Level Five 141+ EG to PG

She also adds a note that the current tests cannot adequately distinguish between EG and PG.

Top
#22068 - 08/04/08 07:37 AM Re: NCLB and Gifted Students [Re: Texas Summer]
Wren Offline
Member

Registered: 01/14/08
Posts: 362
This was very interesting, and all over the map.

Too bad there wasn't a black and white definition, it might help with advocacy.

Ren

Top
#22069 - 08/04/08 07:39 AM Re: NCLB and Gifted Students [Re: Wren]
Dottie Offline
Member

Registered: 06/30/06
Posts: 3280
Loc: The Real World
While it would help greatly with advocacy Ren, it would also require "black and white children", which are rare, grin .

Top
#22070 - 08/04/08 07:45 AM Re: NCLB and Gifted Students [Re: Wren]
bianc850a Offline
Member

Registered: 12/02/07
Posts: 268
Loc: California
This is the Hoagies Chart:

Level of Giftedness IQ score (old test)
(WISC-III, WPPSI-R, SB-4, SB L-M)

MG 130 - 145
HG 145 - 160
EG 160 - 180 (SB L-M only)
PG 180 and above (SB L-M only)

IQ Score (new tests) WISC IV, WPPSI III

MG 130-138
HG 138-145
EG 145-152
PG 152-160


IQ Score (new test) SB5
MG 120-129
HG 125-135
EG 130-140
PG 135-141+

Top
#22071 - 08/04/08 08:42 AM Re: NCLB and Gifted Students [Re: bianc850a]
CFK Offline
Member

Registered: 06/21/07
Posts: 358
Loc: heading in a new direction
I thought the the Hoagies chart was being revised as more children took the SB-V and scored higher on it. I think originally the SB V was returning lower scores than expected and so they adjusted the definitions of LOG downward, but that was changed now.

Or I could be completely wrong!

Top
Page 3 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >


Moderator:  Mark Dlugosz 
December
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
Recent Posts
Weighing social vs. academic needs
by vitzy
0 seconds ago
I think he rushed through the CoGat and blew it!
by StarMan
55 minutes 1 second ago
trouble at school, any ideas?
by inky
Today at 08:26 PM
Letter to the Editor
by inky
Today at 08:10 PM
GIEP meeting has been scheduled.... BUT
by Jool
Today at 07:41 PM